Difference between revisions of "Denialism"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a better definition; further rewriting)
(SMW, navbox)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<hide>
 +
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::cognitive error]]
 +
[[thing type::-ism]]
 +
[[category:isms]]
 +
[[category:working definitions]]
 +
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 +
</hide>
 +
{{nav/dark-arts}}
 
==About==
 
==About==
[[category:isms]][[category:working definitions]][[category:rhetorical deceptions]][[Denialism]] is the repeated re-use of already-defeated but otherwise persuasive arguments -- an implicit ''denial'' that there are any valid counter-arguments. Denialism works when such arguments are presented to audiences which are either naive (unaware of the counter-arguments) or willing (being pre-disposed to agree -- "wanting to believe").
+
[[Denialism]] is the repeated re-use of already-defeated but otherwise persuasive arguments -- an implicit ''denial'' that there are any valid counter-arguments. Denialism works when such arguments are presented to audiences which are either naive (unaware of the counter-arguments) or willing (being pre-disposed to agree -- "wanting to believe").
  
 
Denialist arguments typically have a strong [[emotional argument|emotional]] component, enhancing their reproductive fitness through [[memic evangelism]].
 
Denialist arguments typically have a strong [[emotional argument|emotional]] component, enhancing their reproductive fitness through [[memic evangelism]].

Revision as of 01:34, 27 October 2012

Dark Arts portal

About

Denialism is the repeated re-use of already-defeated but otherwise persuasive arguments -- an implicit denial that there are any valid counter-arguments. Denialism works when such arguments are presented to audiences which are either naive (unaware of the counter-arguments) or willing (being pre-disposed to agree -- "wanting to believe").

Denialist arguments typically have a strong emotional component, enhancing their reproductive fitness through memic evangelism.

This technique generally works best on those whose upbringing has been steeped in ideological protectionism, which renders them unlikely to use rational inquiry to verify information they receive in certain contexts (e.g. at a function sanctioned by appropriate authority, or by an authority-figure).

Nonetheless, it is also possible for skeptical minds to be ensnared in denialism by the use of straw-man packing and possibly other similarly subtle techniques.

Examples

Links

Reference

News

News