Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Google+/users"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Immune to Reason: the thread where I call Gord out. Dunno why I didn't link it earlier.)
(Gord is promoted to troll; gave him a subpage)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This subpage is for notes on individual [[Google+]] users.
 
This subpage is for notes on individual [[Google+]] users.
 
==Issue Idealogues==
 
==Issue Idealogues==
 +
These people are not known for trolling, but have fixed views on certain issues:
 
* [https://plus.google.com/106403022809621967046 Adam Kenigsberg]:
 
* [https://plus.google.com/106403022809621967046 Adam Kenigsberg]:
 
** [https://plus.google.com/104029794170508855321/posts/cZkXYZpZPVe 2012-07-03] - doesn't like atheists or liberals; repeatedly calls me "miz" and "miss" as if he thinks he's scoring points (how common is this?) (may also be one or two other problematic users in that thread)
 
** [https://plus.google.com/104029794170508855321/posts/cZkXYZpZPVe 2012-07-03] - doesn't like atheists or liberals; repeatedly calls me "miz" and "miss" as if he thinks he's scoring points (how common is this?) (may also be one or two other problematic users in that thread)
Line 16: Line 17:
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102337447488628669805 Ryder Spearmann]
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102337447488628669805 Ryder Spearmann]
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/105398101580254540818/posts/GBEXSRVxnya 2012-04-13] anti-Obamacare trolling
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/105398101580254540818/posts/GBEXSRVxnya 2012-04-13] anti-Obamacare trolling
===non-trolls===
 
These people are not known for trolling, but still have poisonous views:
 
 
* [https://plus.google.com/107503635617395328870 Tonia Addison-Hall]: major homophobe
 
* [https://plus.google.com/107503635617395328870 Tonia Addison-Hall]: major homophobe
 
** https://plus.google.com/107503635617395328870/posts/BSB9PKDEz2P
 
** https://plus.google.com/107503635617395328870/posts/BSB9PKDEz2P
Line 26: Line 25:
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/104358908519367189535/about Chris Harrison]
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/104358908519367189535/about Chris Harrison]
 
** https://plus.google.com/u/0/109027288459519863918/posts/CnmJBGXv2CN - dialogue about partisanship and global warming
 
** https://plus.google.com/u/0/109027288459519863918/posts/CnmJBGXv2CN - dialogue about partisanship and global warming
 +
* [[/Gord Birch]]
 
* [https://plus.google.com/104998843805887136938 Jim Morris] -- has twice deleted offending comments after being identified, so save copies (preferably both screencap and text) of what he says first.
 
* [https://plus.google.com/104998843805887136938 Jim Morris] -- has twice deleted offending comments after being identified, so save copies (preferably both screencap and text) of what he says first.
 
* [[/Dan Baker]]
 
* [[/Dan Baker]]
Line 37: Line 37:
 
* [https://plus.google.com/111366164936189851916/ Arthur Gwynne]
 
* [https://plus.google.com/111366164936189851916/ Arthur Gwynne]
 
** https://plus.google.com/104029794170508855321/posts/DvY5T47cbdz - serious, or trolling?
 
** https://plus.google.com/104029794170508855321/posts/DvY5T47cbdz - serious, or trolling?
 
+
==Possible Sockpuppets==
 +
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/116544627668125966978 Gregory Geller]: [[/Gord Birch]] supporter
 +
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/108503876140772272370 John Benussi]: [[/Gord Birch]] supporter, trolling near end of [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/4WNmkamhG8X this thread]
 
==Immune to Reason==
 
==Immune to Reason==
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/jDoXBhPNY5P Gord Birch]
 
** '''2012-12-29''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/jDoXBhPNY5P claims he doesn't need to provide evidence]
 
*** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/106486933038664842533/posts/34RmomPwZ8T reshare] - Gord deleted one of my comments, and pointed this out in a condescending way in the first thread; I finished with "I can't continue to participate in this discussion if Gord is going to arbitrarily delete my comments."
 
*** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/aYQKAoYg1ej I call him out]
 
** '''2013-02-06''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/114822401067576646327/posts/cckr8HGtMyc pops up in one of Maya's threads]
 
*** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/4WNmkamhG8X I call him out again.]
 
 
* [https://plus.google.com/115654160414327824330 Jay Maynard] makes me grind my teeth on some issues, while on others he is quite reasonable
 
* [https://plus.google.com/115654160414327824330 Jay Maynard] makes me grind my teeth on some issues, while on others he is quite reasonable
 
** In [https://plus.google.com/111502940353406919728/posts/bJAEHtz6hbx this thread], Tony Sidaway describes him as "a professional noisemaker with nothing sensible to say on any topic", which seems reasonable.
 
** In [https://plus.google.com/111502940353406919728/posts/bJAEHtz6hbx this thread], Tony Sidaway describes him as "a professional noisemaker with nothing sensible to say on any topic", which seems reasonable.

Revision as of 18:58, 8 February 2013

This subpage is for notes on individual Google+ users.

Issue Idealogues

These people are not known for trolling, but have fixed views on certain issues:

Possible Trolls

Possible Sockpuppets

Immune to Reason

Keep an Eye On

  • Lance Norris (still active as of 2012-04-26)
    • from this thread: "given a choice between he two, I'll go with the Right. Reagan added millions more jobs than Obama has without spending us into oblivion. The current Republican bills calling for lower taxes and other business incentives have been proven more than once. Obama's stimulus? Thanks to the Democrats we have more debt than at any other time in history and the job growth it was suppose to create still hasn't occurred." When asked for evidence, said he would provide it but was taking an ill relative to the hospital, "stay tuned".
  • Jim Clark - account not found as of 2012-04-26

Users With Businesses

Regional Sympathizers

Sympathetic types whose general location is known -- might be able to fact-check: