Difference between revisions of "2012 Benghazi attack"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎To File: news)
(→‎To File: another link; split into subsections)
Line 67: Line 67:
 
** [[URL/to file::http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324653004578652351161838238.html|U.S. Files Sealed Charges in Benghazi Attack]]
 
** [[URL/to file::http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324653004578652351161838238.html|U.S. Files Sealed Charges in Benghazi Attack]]
 
* '''2015-10-18''' [http://democrats.benghazi.house.gov/news/press-releases/cia-debunks-gowdy-s-allegation-that-clinton-email-contained-classified-cia CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source]
 
* '''2015-10-18''' [http://democrats.benghazi.house.gov/news/press-releases/cia-debunks-gowdy-s-allegation-that-clinton-email-contained-classified-cia CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source]
* anti-coverup:
+
* '''2015-10-22''' [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11947018/Mothers-of-CIA-officers-killed-in-Benghazi-condemn-use-of-sons-deaths-for-political-gain.html Mothers of CIA officers killed in Benghazi condemn use of sons' deaths for political gain]
** '''2012-10-25''' [[URL/to file::http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/benghazi-libya-state-emails|GOP's Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke]]
+
====anti-coverup====
*** '''Accusation''': "[T]he president and his advisers repeatedly told us the attack was spontaneous reaction to the anti-Muslim video and that it lacked information suggesting it was a terrorist assault" ([[URL/to file::http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/white-house-e-mails-blow-up-its-libya-cover-story/2012/10/24/713ed4e6-1d8e-11e2-ba31-3083ca97c314_blog.html|Jennifer Rubin]]); "Barack Obama was willfully and knowingly lying to the American people." ([[URL/to file::http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/10/lies-scandal-and-politics-benghazi/|Danielle Pletka]])
+
* '''2012-10-25''' [[URL/to file::http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/benghazi-libya-state-emails|GOP's Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke]]
*** '''Reality''': Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi, the group suspected of attacking the consulate, expressed approval of the assault but never claimed responsibility for it. Of course, it could have been another group, but what's the evidence that there was ''any'' terrorist group involved? And why is it important?
+
** '''Accusation''': "[T]he president and his advisers repeatedly told us the attack was spontaneous reaction to the anti-Muslim video and that it lacked information suggesting it was a terrorist assault" ([[URL/to file::http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/white-house-e-mails-blow-up-its-libya-cover-story/2012/10/24/713ed4e6-1d8e-11e2-ba31-3083ca97c314_blog.html|Jennifer Rubin]]); "Barack Obama was willfully and knowingly lying to the American people." ([[URL/to file::http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/10/lies-scandal-and-politics-benghazi/|Danielle Pletka]])
** '''2012-11-01''' [[URL/to file::http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/world/africa/cia-played-major-defensive-role-in-libya-attack.html?pagewanted=all|C.I.A. Played Major Role Fighting Militants in Libya Attack]] "At a time when the circumstances surrounding the attack on the Benghazi compound have emerged as a major political issue, with Republicans criticizing the Obama administration's handling of the episode, the senior official also sought to rebut reports that C.I.A. requests for support from the Pentagon that night had gone unheeded."
+
** '''Reality''': Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi, the group suspected of attacking the consulate, expressed approval of the assault but never claimed responsibility for it. Of course, it could have been another group, but what's the evidence that there was ''any'' terrorist group involved? And why is it important?
** '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/05/08/benghazi-seige-new-testimony-old-political-games/|Benghazi siege: New testimony, old political games]]
+
* '''2012-11-01''' [[URL/to file::http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/world/africa/cia-played-major-defensive-role-in-libya-attack.html?pagewanted=all|C.I.A. Played Major Role Fighting Militants in Libya Attack]] "At a time when the circumstances surrounding the attack on the Benghazi compound have emerged as a major political issue, with Republicans criticizing the Obama administration's handling of the episode, the senior official also sought to rebut reports that C.I.A. requests for support from the Pentagon that night had gone unheeded."
** '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/08/1982151/witnesses-debunk-benghazi/?mobile=nc|GOP Star Witnesses Debunk Right-Wing Benghazi Conspiracy Theories]]
+
* '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/05/08/benghazi-seige-new-testimony-old-political-games/|Benghazi siege: New testimony, old political games]]
*** '''Accusations''':
+
* '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/08/1982151/witnesses-debunk-benghazi/?mobile=nc|GOP Star Witnesses Debunk Right-Wing Benghazi Conspiracy Theories]]
**** 1. F-16s could have been sent to Benghazi to prevent 2nd wave of attacks.
+
** '''Accusations''':
**** 2. [[Hillary Clinton]] signed cables denying additional security to Benghazi.
+
*** 1. F-16s could have been sent to Benghazi to prevent 2nd wave of attacks.
**** 3. A Special Forces Team that could have saved lives was told to stand down.
+
*** 2. [[Hillary Clinton]] signed cables denying additional security to Benghazi.
**** 4. The State Department's Accountability Review Board isn't legitimate.
+
*** 3. A Special Forces Team that could have saved lives was told to stand down.
*** '''Reality''':
+
*** 4. The State Department's Accountability Review Board isn't legitimate.
**** 1. Joint Chief of Staff Gen Martin Dempsey [[URL/to file::http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-fg-benghazi-hearing-20130508,0,136759.story|said]] that no air assets were in range the night of the attack.
+
** '''Reality''':
**** 2. All three witnesses [[URL/to file::http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/26/1205051/-Conspiracy-riddled-House-Republican-Benghazi-report-suffers-fatal-very-stupid-flaw|agreed]] that the name of the Secretary of State (who was at that time Hillary Clinton) is placed at the bottom of all outgoing cables and telegrams from Foggy Bottom, whether the Secretary has viewed them or not.
+
*** 1. Joint Chief of Staff Gen Martin Dempsey [[URL/to file::http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-fg-benghazi-hearing-20130508,0,136759.story|said]] that no air assets were in range the night of the attack.
**** 3. The team was ready to be deployed to secure the airport, not to join the fighting at the CIA annex. Another team had already been deployed to Benghazi earlier.
+
*** 2. All three witnesses [[URL/to file::http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/26/1205051/-Conspiracy-riddled-House-Republican-Benghazi-report-suffers-fatal-very-stupid-flaw|agreed]] that the name of the Secretary of State (who was at that time Hillary Clinton) is placed at the bottom of all outgoing cables and telegrams from Foggy Bottom, whether the Secretary has viewed them or not.
**** 4. Eric Nordstrom, the Regional Security Officer for Libya prior to the assault in Benghazi, said he "absolutely" believes implementing the recommendations would improve security. "I had an opportunity to review that along with other two committee reports. I think taken altogether, they're fairly comprehensive and reasonable."
+
*** 3. The team was ready to be deployed to secure the airport, not to join the fighting at the CIA annex. Another team had already been deployed to Benghazi earlier.
** '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1zMJoRR7i4|Stewart Rips Fox News Over Benghazi Coverage Denizens Of Bullsh*t Mountain]] (video: [[Jon Stewart]]) aka "Big Benghazi Theory"
+
*** 4. Eric Nordstrom, the Regional Security Officer for Libya prior to the assault in Benghazi, said he "absolutely" believes implementing the recommendations would improve security. "I had an opportunity to review that along with other two committee reports. I think taken altogether, they're fairly comprehensive and reasonable."
** '''2013-05-09''' (Thu) [[URL/to file::http://www.politicususa.com/republican-propagandists-pr-push-prove-benghazi-hearings-politically-motivated.html|Republican PR Push Proves Benghazi Hearings Are Politically Motivated]]
+
* '''2013-05-08''' (Wed) [[URL/to file::http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1zMJoRR7i4|Stewart Rips Fox News Over Benghazi Coverage Denizens Of Bullsh*t Mountain]] (video: [[Jon Stewart]]) aka "Big Benghazi Theory"
** '''2013-05-10''' (Fri) [[URL/to file::http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/05/11/18184149-a-look-at-the-republican-benghazi-talking-points-as-theyve-been-laid-out-so-far|A look at the Republican Benghazi talking points as they've been laid out so far]] (video: [[Rachel Maddow]])
+
* '''2013-05-09''' (Thu) [[URL/to file::http://www.politicususa.com/republican-propagandists-pr-push-prove-benghazi-hearings-politically-motivated.html|Republican PR Push Proves Benghazi Hearings Are Politically Motivated]]
*** [http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/vp/51849144#51849144 full show] in which Benghazi is put in context of relentless and generally pointless GOP attacks on Obama
+
* '''2013-05-10''' (Fri) [[URL/to file::http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/05/11/18184149-a-look-at-the-republican-benghazi-talking-points-as-theyve-been-laid-out-so-far|A look at the Republican Benghazi talking points as they've been laid out so far]] (video: [[Rachel Maddow]])
** '''2013-05-12''' (Sun) [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/12/1998811/bushs-secretary-of-defense-mocks-gop-attacks-on-obamas-handling-of-benghazi/?mobile=nc|Bush's Secretary of Defense Mocks GOP Attacks On Obama's Handling Of Benghazi]] "Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a Republican who was appointed to the position by George W. Bush, told CBS News on Saturday that he would have handled the situation in Benghazi the same way that the Obama administration did last September."
+
** [http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/vp/51849144#51849144 full show] in which Benghazi is put in context of relentless and generally pointless GOP attacks on Obama
** '''2013-05-13''' (Mon)
+
* '''2013-05-12''' (Sun) [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/12/1998811/bushs-secretary-of-defense-mocks-gop-attacks-on-obamas-handling-of-benghazi/?mobile=nc|Bush's Secretary of Defense Mocks GOP Attacks On Obama's Handling Of Benghazi]] "Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a Republican who was appointed to the position by George W. Bush, told CBS News on Saturday that he would have handled the situation in Benghazi the same way that the Obama administration did last September."
*** [[URL/to file::http://gawker.com/cnn-says-abcs-benghazi-scoop-used-a-fake-quote-505835408|CNN Says ABC's Benghazi Scoop Used a Fake Quote]] "The words "including those of the State Department," which established the motive behind the revisions – and which ABC put in quotation marks, to indicate that they were the actual text of the email – were not in the email at all. If Tapper's email is legitimate, ABC took a fabricated quote from its source and published it as real."
+
* '''2013-05-13''' (Mon)
*** [[URL/to file::http://www.kbtx.com/news/headlines/Gates-Some-Benghazi-Critics-Have-Cartoonish-View-of-Military-Capability-207111921.html|Gates: Some Benghazi Critics Have 'Cartoonish' View of Military Capability]]
+
** [[URL/to file::http://gawker.com/cnn-says-abcs-benghazi-scoop-used-a-fake-quote-505835408|CNN Says ABC's Benghazi Scoop Used a Fake Quote]] "The words "including those of the State Department," which established the motive behind the revisions – and which ABC put in quotation marks, to indicate that they were the actual text of the email – were not in the email at all. If Tapper's email is legitimate, ABC took a fabricated quote from its source and published it as real."
** '''2013-05-14''' (Tue) [[URL/to file::http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/cnn-exclusive-white-house-email-contradicts-benghazi-leaks/|CNN exclusive: White House email contradicts Benghazi leaks]]
+
** [[URL/to file::http://www.kbtx.com/news/headlines/Gates-Some-Benghazi-Critics-Have-Cartoonish-View-of-Military-Capability-207111921.html|Gates: Some Benghazi Critics Have 'Cartoonish' View of Military Capability]]
* pro-coverup:
+
* '''2013-05-14''' (Tue) [[URL/to file::http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/cnn-exclusive-white-house-email-contradicts-benghazi-leaks/|CNN exclusive: White House email contradicts Benghazi leaks]]
** '''2012-10-17''' [[URL/to file::http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/candy-crowleys-benghazi-lifeline-to-obama/|Candy Crowley's Benghazi Lifeline to Obama]]: not really clear what the accusation is.
+
====pro-coverup====
*** Note that this is an unashamedly partisan site: their tagline is "Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out"
+
* '''2012-10-17''' [[URL/to file::http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/candy-crowleys-benghazi-lifeline-to-obama/|Candy Crowley's Benghazi Lifeline to Obama]]: not really clear what the accusation is.
** '''2013-05-12''' [[URL/to file::http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323716304578479312876899572.html|Benghazi Disinformation Points]] "Friday's revelation that the Obama Administration's talking points on Benghazi were revised a dozen times adds another reason not to trust the official story line. It also gives Congress new cause to keep digging."
+
** Note that this is an unashamedly partisan site: their tagline is "Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out"
** '''2013-05-12'''(?) [[URL/to file::http://m.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-scandal-grows_722032.html|The Benghazi Scandal Grows]]:
+
* '''2013-05-12''' [[URL/to file::http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323716304578479312876899572.html|Benghazi Disinformation Points]] "Friday's revelation that the Obama Administration's talking points on Benghazi were revised a dozen times adds another reason not to trust the official story line. It also gives Congress new cause to keep digging."
*** '''Accusation''': talking points emailed on 2012-09-14 described the incident as "a terrorist attack conducted by a large group of Islamic extremists, including some with ties to al Qaeda." A revised draft on 2012-09-15 mentioned only "extremists" who might have participated in "violent demonstrations." Article claims there is reason to believe the first version is correct.
+
* '''2013-05-12'''(?) [[URL/to file::http://m.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-scandal-grows_722032.html|The Benghazi Scandal Grows]]:
*** '''Reality''':
+
** '''Accusation''': talking points emailed on 2012-09-14 described the incident as "a terrorist attack conducted by a large group of Islamic extremists, including some with ties to al Qaeda." A revised draft on 2012-09-15 mentioned only "extremists" who might have participated in "violent demonstrations." Article claims there is reason to believe the first version is correct.
**** Even if true, all this proves is that the later emails were based on a mistaken assessment; it doesn't provide compelling evidence of a cover-up.
+
** '''Reality''':
**** The evidence for terrorist connections: "One of the jihadists, a member of Ansar al Sharia, reported to the other that he had participated in the assault on the U.S. diplomatic post. Solid evidence." ...except that Ansa al-Sharia did not take credit for the attack.
+
*** Even if true, all this proves is that the later emails were based on a mistaken assessment; it doesn't provide compelling evidence of a cover-up.
*** Article is datestamped 2013-05-20, but it was posted on or before 2013-05-12.
+
*** The evidence for terrorist connections: "One of the jihadists, a member of Ansar al Sharia, reported to the other that he had participated in the assault on the U.S. diplomatic post. Solid evidence." ...except that Ansa al-Sharia did not take credit for the attack.
** '''2013-05-14''' [[URL/to file::http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2013/05/14/dick-cheney-benghazi-cover-still-ongoing|Dick Cheney on Benghazi: 'The cover-up is still ongoing']]: [[Dick Cheney]] speaks with [[Sean Hannity]] on [[Fox News]]
+
** Article is datestamped 2013-05-20, but it was posted on or before 2013-05-12.
* security funding:
+
* '''2013-05-14''' [[URL/to file::http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2013/05/14/dick-cheney-benghazi-cover-still-ongoing|Dick Cheney on Benghazi: 'The cover-up is still ongoing']]: [[Dick Cheney]] speaks with [[Sean Hannity]] on [[Fox News]]
** '''2012-10-10''' [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/?mobile=nc|GOP Rep: I "Absolutely" Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security]]: "Rep. [[Jason Chaffetz]] (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that the Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month."
+
====security funding====
 +
* '''2012-10-10''' [[URL/to file::http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/?mobile=nc|GOP Rep: I "Absolutely" Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security]]: "Rep. [[Jason Chaffetz]] (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that the Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month."

Revision as of 22:59, 22 October 2015

About

The 2012 Benghazi attack was an event in which the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya was attacked on 2012-09-11 by a heavily armed group, resulting in the deaths of four diplomatic mission members:

Controversy

The event has been the source of ongoing controversy, as the Obama administration has been repeatedly accused by those on the political Right of orchestrating a cover-up, while those on the Left seem to feel that the cover-up arguments are insubstantial and politically motivated.

The key question seems to be whether or not there was evidence linking the attack to any terrorist groups, Ansar al-Sharia (AAS) being the prime suspect because one of their members supposedly said he participated. However, although AAS posted messages approving of the attack, they did not take credit for it. More solid evidence is needed to resolve the question.

Based on the assumption that the evidence was both solid and known to the Obama administration, Republicans have accused Obama of lying about the nature of the attack and attempting to cover up the evidence. They have also launched a number of other secondary attacks, including accusations against then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

There is some hypocrisy involved in that congressional Republicans:

There is further hypocrisy in the fact that US diplomatic facilities (4 embassies and 7 consulates) were attacked during the Bush-Cheney administration no less than eleven times, with a total of 47 dead (including a US diplomat), yet the GOP did not see any need to investigate:

It seems very likely that this is a manufactroversy created as part of the general GOP campaign to drum up anger at Obama, although we are still awaiting conclusive evidence.

Pages

Links

Reference

Video

  • 2013-05-08 hearing: "The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee conducts a hearing with Foreign Service officers focusing on information turned over to the committee by administration whistle-blowers on the Benghazi terrorist attacks."

Related


To File

anti-coverup

pro-coverup

  • 2012-10-17 Candy Crowley's Benghazi Lifeline to Obama: not really clear what the accusation is.
    • Note that this is an unashamedly partisan site: their tagline is "Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out"
  • 2013-05-12 Benghazi Disinformation Points "Friday's revelation that the Obama Administration's talking points on Benghazi were revised a dozen times adds another reason not to trust the official story line. It also gives Congress new cause to keep digging."
  • 2013-05-12(?) The Benghazi Scandal Grows:
    • Accusation: talking points emailed on 2012-09-14 described the incident as "a terrorist attack conducted by a large group of Islamic extremists, including some with ties to al Qaeda." A revised draft on 2012-09-15 mentioned only "extremists" who might have participated in "violent demonstrations." Article claims there is reason to believe the first version is correct.
    • Reality:
      • Even if true, all this proves is that the later emails were based on a mistaken assessment; it doesn't provide compelling evidence of a cover-up.
      • The evidence for terrorist connections: "One of the jihadists, a member of Ansar al Sharia, reported to the other that he had participated in the assault on the U.S. diplomatic post. Solid evidence." ...except that Ansa al-Sharia did not take credit for the attack.
    • Article is datestamped 2013-05-20, but it was posted on or before 2013-05-12.
  • 2013-05-14 Dick Cheney on Benghazi: 'The cover-up is still ongoing': Dick Cheney speaks with Sean Hannity on Fox News

security funding